Court of Appeals 07.14.09

I feel compelled in some way to report on the Court’s latest opinion release, especially since there’s a published land-use decision.  That said, even I’m having a hard time finding much to take away from these cases.  The neighbor-petitioner in Krummenacher v. Minnetonka challenges the city’s ability to allow expansion of nonconforming use by variance; the statute since 2004 has been pretty clear about a city’s ability to allow expansion through a hearing/permit process of its choosing.  An unpublished opinion on a negligent-repair case from Waseca is a helpful run-down of the benefits of having a road-repair policy, but nothing out of the ordinary.  And like most end runs, the legal outcome of “Gun SMOKE Monologues” fails to surprise. 

Summertime blues, maybe?


One Response to “Court of Appeals 07.14.09”

  1. Supreme Court 01.10.09 « Minnesota Municipal Law Blog Says:

    […] changes in a nonconforming use.  When the opinion came out, I really didn’t find it all that remarkable.  Maybe the Court is just trying to catch up in the area of zoning nonconformities, where our […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: